Track every EU AI Act requirement for every AI system. Know exactly what's done, what's pending, and what's at risk—with clear visibility for your entire team.
The EU AI Act introduces dozens of specific requirements—and tracking them across multiple AI systems quickly becomes overwhelming.
Most teams start with spreadsheets. But as AI systems multiply and requirements evolve, spreadsheets become maintenance nightmares. Version control breaks down. Requirements slip through the cracks.
Leadership asks: "Are we compliant?" Without a unified tracking system, answering that question requires hours of investigation and educated guessing.
The August 2026 deadline for high-risk AI isn't flexible. With 113+ requirements across multiple articles, it's easy to underestimate the work remaining—until it's too late.
Even when requirements are tracked, the evidence proving completion lives in scattered locations—Google Drive, email threads, Confluence pages. Auditors don't accept "I'm pretty sure we did this."
Protectron replaces spreadsheet chaos with a purpose-built compliance tracking system that knows exactly what the EU AI Act requires.
Protectron automatically generates the complete requirement checklist for each AI system based on its risk classification. Track progress, assign owners, attach evidence, and know your exact compliance status at any moment.
Based on your risk classification, we generate the exact requirements that apply—no manual research needed.
See overall compliance percentage, identify gaps, and track progress across all AI systems from a single dashboard.
Every completed requirement links to evidence. Export compliance reports that auditors and customers trust.
Start with our Risk Classification to determine your AI's risk level. This determines which requirements apply. High-risk AI gets 113+ requirements across Articles 9-15.
Based on classification, Protectron generates your complete requirement checklist with clear descriptions, acceptance criteria, article references, and suggested evidence types.
Mark requirements as In Progress, Complete, or Blocked. Assign owners, add notes, link evidence, and set custom due dates with reminders.
View real-time compliance status with overall completion percentages, cross-system dashboards, and export audit-ready reports.
For high-risk AI systems, we cover all requirements from Articles 9-15
A continuous, documented process for identifying and mitigating AI risks.
Practices ensuring training, validation, and testing data meets quality standards.
Comprehensive documentation enabling conformity assessment and regulatory oversight.
Automatic logging capabilities for traceability throughout AI system lifetime.
Clear information enabling deployers to understand and use the AI system appropriately.
Measures enabling human oversight during AI system operation.
Click through requirements, update status, and see exactly what's needed. Each requirement expands to show acceptance criteria and suggested evidence.
Assign requirements to team members. Track who owns what. Get notified when assigned requirements are overdue or blocked.
Connect requirements directly to evidence. See at a glance which requirements have evidence attached and which need documentation.
Visual progress bars and completion percentages for each AI system. Roll up to organization-wide compliance status.
Set due dates for requirements. Receive automated reminders as deadlines approach. Never be surprised by a compliance gap.
One-click generation of compliance reports showing status, evidence links, and audit trail. Export as PDF for auditors.
Requirements are generated based on your Risk Classification results. High-risk AI systems get the full set of Articles 9-15 requirements. Limited-risk systems get transparency requirements. If you use GPAI models, those obligations are added automatically.
Yes. While we provide the complete EU AI Act requirement set, you can add custom requirements for internal policies, customer-specific obligations, or other regulations you're tracking alongside EU AI Act.
Each requirement has defined acceptance criteria. You mark it complete when you've met those criteria and attached supporting evidence. The evidence linkage provides the audit trail proving completion.
Absolutely. Assign different requirements to different team members. Everyone sees real-time status updates. Comments and activity logs keep everyone aligned.
Auditors want to see: (1) which requirements apply, (2) evidence of compliance, and (3) an audit trail of actions taken. Protectron provides all three in exportable reports. Many customers share their Protectron dashboard directly with auditors.
Stop guessing about EU AI Act requirements. See exactly what applies to your AI systems and track your progress toward compliance.